Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
“Serving the Washington horticulture community since 1937.”

Keys to Sustainable Gardens

by Kate Easton, CPH

Where garden design principles support sustainable ecosystems, specific low impact development techniques and choices for managing water, soil, and nutrition are the keys to minimizing the impact of humans on the larger ecosystem and enhancing your garden ecology. These design choices and practices that maximize aesthetics and minimize disturbance include: storm water management through controlled infiltration for a more hydrologically functional landscape; protection of native vegetation and restoration of native species through design and maintenance; integrated pest management and other low impact controls; a deliberate and planned soil building and maintenance program; and a planned system of garden maintenance. This article focuses on managing water and plant protection techniques.

Managing Water
Puget Sound lowlands have a geological history shaped by glacier action, native forest growth, and a climate strongly influenced by the moderating affects of the marine environment. With water everywhere, it is easy to take it for granted because much of what happens is underground. However, the encroachment of cities and towns on the native forests have also affected how much and when water recharges aquifers that supply water to communities, and the discharging of water to streams and lakes. These changes in turn affect the plant and animal communities which also impacts the ability of some businesses to be profitable.

Research shows that half "the annual rainfall [of wet coniferous forest] is intercepted by foliage and evaporated during the rainy season" (Hinman 2005) – this is evapotranspiration. In addition, native soils (highly organic matter chemically and physically bound to mineral particles creating stable substrates 2 to 4 feet deep) move water slowly down slope over many hours, days or weeks. Native soils absorb 20 to 30 percent of the precipitation (infiltration) and can move 10 to 40 percent of annual precipitation and move it into deeper groundwater (interflow). The typical storm event of gentle rainfall on forests allows water to move down slope below the surface and slowly displaces subsurface water near streams, lakes and wetlands. As a result of evapotranspiration, interflow and infiltration, surface runoff in native forests is less than 1 percent of the precipitation delivered in the average storm event.

In contrast, the typical developed community surface runoff from an average storm event accounts for 20 to 30 percent of total precipitation, evapotranspiration for 20 to 30 percent and interflow for 0 to 30 percent. The causes of these changes in water absorption and flow are directly related to the amount of impervious surface, changes in soil structure and reduced levels of plant material. Impervious surfaces include roads, parking lots, side walks, and roofs. Changes in soil structure is largely a result of the practice of clearing and leveling land for development below the two to foot limit of native soils. The result is sand, silt, and clay (e.g., minerals) with no to very limited bio-organisms and little, if any, organic material to feed them. Plant material levels are reduced because part of the ground that was forest is now covered by a structure and the landscapes installed by housing developers are usually the minimum to cover the ground for aesthetic value. Many newly installed landscapes fail because there are no or minimal nutrients in the soil to support plant growth or persistence for the long term. Where development causes changes to wetlands by either increasing or reducing water levels, additional plant material changes through succession occurs and results in changes in wildlife that can live in that environment. Also, the natural filtering capabilities of wetlands is altered so that pollutants may be released into water bodies as overflows occur or redirected to other soil that can not filter pollutants.

As a result of these factors, watershed conditions and streams are impacted by the increased amount of surface water. Storm flow volumes and increased large storm event frequency cause increased erosion of streams, increased sedimentation, increased water pollutant load (hydrocarbons, heavy metals, etc.), and increased blockage of streams (sedimentation, loosened rock). Stream and river channels become unstable and bank habitat is lost. As banks loose stability and sedimentation increases, water quality decreases and habitat of water creatures and those that prey on them is lost. More water goes directly into streams without the natural filtration of infiltration and interflow processes. As a consequence, excessive nutrients end up in the water and feed excessive aquatic plant growth resulting in excessive daily oxygen fluctuations that can cause or increase the death of aquatic dwellers. Also, with increased flows directly into water bodies, less water is infiltrated into underground aquifers, while demands on those aquifers increases as communities expand.

"Heavy metal concentrations of less than 1 percent can alter spawning and migration behavior of salmon and trout. Eighteen of forty-five endocrine disrupters are found in Puget Sound fish tissue. Water for human consumption is held to higher quality standards than stream outflows. N of N1 streams in Kitsap County fail to meet Washington State’s water quality standards."

Low impact development as defined by "Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound" addresses the affect of community development on the native forest environment with the intent of restoring natural infiltration and interflow processes to the extent possible so that communities will continue to have fresh, potable water while also supporting native or restored forests, streams, lakes and wetlands.

Low Impact Development Defined
Low Impact Development (LID) is a storm water management and land development strategy applied at the parcel and subdivision scale that emphasizes conservation and use of on-site natural features integrated with engineered, small scale hydrologic controls to more closely mimic pre-development hydrologic functions. – Chris Hinman, Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound

Gardeners and homeowners can apply LID techniques to their garden and property to contribute to the overall improvement of interception, infiltration and interflow of water on their property. LID techniques such as grading and clearing practices, use of pervious surfaces, cisterns (or other water collection methods), rain gardens, roof gardens, protecting and restoring vegetation levels, building good soil and a regular maintenance program that emphasizes monitoring and matching controls to the level of the problem.

Impervious materials for patios and walkways can be replaced with pavers or flagstone laid in coarse sand or gravel. In order to increase the amount of interflow in this area, additional preparation steps are needed.

"We’re always talking about biodiversity, but that’s an abstract term. We’re not saving the panda because of biodiversity. We’re saving it because it arouses our emotion. And the emotional component is extraordinarily important to get the public behind conservation." – George Schaller, National Geographic, October 2006

LID Defined
The first step of LID implementation and garden design is completing a site assessment and needs inventory. Garden design site assessment collects data on climate (temperature, precipitation, wind); topography (slopes, gradients, and where the water collects); soils (texture, hydrology, depth); views and privacy needs; existing plant material and habitat; structures; utilities and existing uses; owner needs and budget. Where LID considers surrounding land use, zoning, access and utility availability, garden design considers ways to screen or frame of views of what is beyond the property line, accessibility for owners and visitors rather than community circulation, and designing with utility location in mind while zoning is already determined. A needs inventory is listing all the owner must-haves, the desires and wants-if-it-fits-in-the-budget. Sample site assessment and needs inventory worksheets can be found at www.gardenvisioninc.com/filename

After site assessment and needs inventory, the next step is site planning and layout. Design principles for sustainable gardens inform the design process (discussed in the fall 2006 issue of West Sound Homes and Gardens). Site planning and layout is the ‘lego-block’ view of all the design elements on the wish list to create the sense of place and an aesthetically pleasing arrangement. Once a trial arrangement is decided, the details of implementation and planting design are determined. At this step, LID practices to managing water become the center of sustainable garden design. Many times a trial design reveals technical implementation barriers in that necessitate a design modification to meet the objectives. Sometimes a trial plan will exceed the budget or not adequately address an owner need so it’s back to the drawing board.

Once a general layout is determined, then the detailed planning begins. This includes choosing materials, methods, and specific plant material. When a plan includes adding structures (decks, patios, arbors, gazebos, etc.), consider placement to minimize grading and clearing so that native soils are disturbed the least amount possible. (If new construction has already disturbed soils, see the soil building section below.) If grading is needed, reduce or eliminate erosion by doing work during the dry season (April to October); clear and grade only the area needed for the structure; terrace steeper slopes to be just wide enough for the design feature; use equipment with a low soil compaction effect. These techniques allow precipitation to be infiltrated and approach native soils interflow volumes.

If it’s certified it must be good, right?
There are two major forest sustainablility certification bodies in the US: The Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forest Initiative. The former is a multi-discipline, internationally represented organization while the latter is comprised of US businesses in the industry. The author has not reviewed the specific standards and guidelines of either organization. However, the reader can research via the online resources listed here.

Forest Stewardship Council
Loggers, foresters, environmentalists, and sociologists formed the FSC, a global organization, in 1993 to answer the question "what is sustainable forestry?". This body defined standards and practices to answer the question. Certification occurs through "accredited, independent, "third-party" certification bodies or "certifiers" certify forests. They assess forest management using the FSC principles, criteria, and standards, [while] each certifier uses their own evaluative process." More at http://www.fscus.org/

Sustainable Forest Initiative
Established in 1995 by the American Forest & Paper Association (a trade organization), the Sustainable Forest Initiative (SFI) defines labeling requirements and business practices for companies that manufacture and/or sell forest products. Currently there are four certifications: Certified Participant, Participating Manufacturer, Particpating Publisher and Participating Retailer. Each certification has its own application process and requirements based on the SFI Principles. "These principles call upon SFI program participants to meet market demands while using environmentally responsible practices that promote the protection of wildlife, plants, soil, air and water quality to ensure the future of our nation's forests." Applicants are approved by the board only when the standards for the certification are met. In addition, "the program must meet or exceed the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) green marketing guidelines. These guidelines require that the claims associated with product labeling are truthful and do not deceive the consumer." See more information about SFI at http://www.aboutsfi.org/

http://research.yale.edu/gisf/
http://www.yale.edu/forestcertification/faq.html - certification FAQ
http://www.sustainableforests.net/
http://www.sustainableforests.net/info.php (links broken to National Report on Sustainable Forests at USDA web site – Research and Development goes back to ‘parent listing’ page - hmmmm)
http://certificationwatch.org/ - subscription newsletter website that tracks and informs on forest sustainability certification and more. Cost of subscription for the most devoted researcher, while 2 week trial may be of interest to others.
http://www.sustainableforest.com/ - portal site with links (pop-ups to other sites; not much value directly)
http://ncseonline.org/NCSSF/ - convened and managed by the National Council for Science and the Environment. "NCSSF's mission is to improve the scientific basis for the design, conduct and evaluation of sustainable forest practices in the United States. NCSSF sponsors work of the highest technical quality that is relevant to the urgent needs of forest managers, practitioners and policymakers. "

Other online resources
http://www.vashti.net/mceinc/Golden.htm
http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibInArt.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

Resources
Hinman, C (May 2005) "Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound," Puget Sound Action Team and Washington State University. Electronic version available at http://www.psat.wa.gov/Programs/LID.htm

    
   
  Copyright © 2008, WSNLA. All Rights Reserved.